MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018235931

Coton COT67B Résistant Aux Insectes

2014· other· fr· W7018235931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueContact-less Assessment of In-vivo Body Signals Using Microwave Doppler Radar (InTech) · 2014
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101LiquationDiafiltrationDysgeusiaTriacetinFusible alloyEmperipolesis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Santé Canada a avisé Syngenta Seeds Canada Inc. qu’il ne\ns’oppose pas à l’utilisation alimentaire de la lignée de\ncoton COT67B résistant aux insectes. Le Ministère a\nréalisé une évaluation approfondie de cette lignée de\ncoton conformément à ses Lignes directrices sur l’évaluation\nde l’innocuité des aliments nouveaux. Ces lignes directrices\nsont fondées sur des principes admis internationalement\npour l’établissement de l’innocuité des aliments à \ncaractères nouveaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContact-less Assessment of In-vivo Body Signals Using Microwave Doppler Radar (InTech)French-language works237,207