MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018249446

Database of the iodine content of food and diets populated with data from published literature

2003· other· en· W7018249446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIodineLeafy vegetablesFish <Actinopterygii>Fish productsFood composition dataFood groupFood processing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A database of results for the iodine content of foods and die ts was prepared for a DFID funded&#13;\nproject looking at "Environmental Controls in Iodine Deficiency Disorders". It was populated&#13;\nwith citations from the literature and contains 732 records. On the basis of these data, the&#13;\ngeometric mean result for the iodine content of foods is 87 μg/kg, from 494 citations.&#13;\nUsing classifications based on food type the following order for levels of iodine is determined:&#13;\nMarine fish (1455.9 μg/kg) &gt; Freshwater fish (102.8 μg/kg) &gt; Leafy vegetables (88.8 μg/kg) &gt; Dairy (83.9 μg/kg) &gt;&#13;\nOther vegetables (80.1 μg/kg) &gt; Meat (68.4 μg/kg) &gt; Cereals (56.0 μg/kg) &gt; Fresh fruit (30.6 μg/kg) &gt; Bread (17.0&#13;\nμg/kg) &gt; Water (6.4 μg/l)&#13;\n(The figure in brackets represents the geometric mean value for each group)&#13;\nThe results show that in general grain crops are poorer sources of iodine than vegetables and that&#13;\nthere is some equivocal evidence to suggest that leafy vegetables contain higher iodine&#13;\nconcentrations than other vegetables but fish and seaweed are by far the greatest natural sources&#13;\nof iodine in foodstuffs.&#13;\nThe geometric mean result for the average daily dietary intake is 161 μg/day, based on 84&#13;\ncitations. It is noted that vegetarian and vegan diets often do not meet the recommended adult&#13;\ndaily intake of 150 μgI/day due to the lack of dairy, meat and fish components. Results also&#13;\nshow that Japanese, USA and Canadian dietary intakes are higher than other countries.&#13;\nIntake depends not only on the iodine content of the food but also on the composition of the diet.&#13;\nResults show that food accounts for over 90% of human iodine exposure in most circumstances&#13;\nwith water and air providing minimal inputs. However, in subsistence populations drinking highiodine&#13;\ngroundwaters, water can contribute more than 20% of the dietary intake. Results of&#13;\ndietary studies show the following general order of percentage daily iodine intake from the main&#13;\nfood groups in Western Countries:&#13;\nDairy (50%) &gt; Cereals (20%) &gt; Fish (9%) &gt; Meat (8%) &gt; Vegetables (7%) &gt; Sweets (5%) &gt; Fruits (1%)&#13;\nThe majority of iodine in Western diets comes from adventitious sources such as iodophors in&#13;\nthe dairy industry, red food colouring and improvers in cereals, bread, meat and sweets.&#13;\nRemoving these components to equate to a developing country diet where people are often&#13;\ndependant on staple grain foodstuffs such as rice shows that intakes fall below 100 μg/day. It is&#13;\nconcluded that without adventitious sources of iodine or a marine foods component, most diets&#13;\nwould fail to provide the recommended daily intake of 150 μg/day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0130.027
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council)French-language works237,207