De la pitance indigeste au divin pot-au-feu : la quête du bon repas comme thème dans lâÅuvre de Joris-Karl Huysmans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question alimentaire, chez Joris-Karl Huysmans, est une préoccupation centrale. Son œuvre témoigne d’un réel intérêt pour la nourriture et le motif de la quête du repas structure plusieurs de ses écrits. Bien au-delà de la simple question diététique, j’émets l’hypothèse que l’alimentation constitue chez Huysmans un véritable topos qui parcourt l’œuvre et la structure. Depuis la névrose de l’indigeste jusqu’à l’élévation spirituelle des nourritures célestes, elle progresse dans un cheminement toujours plus mystique alors que le mangeur tente d’accéder à la béatitude alimentaire.\nAfin de mieux cerner cette évolution thématique et discursive, j’examine principalement un corpus restreint comprenant À Vau-l’eau (1882), En Ménage (1881), À Rebours (1884) et Là-bas (1891). Ces quatre œuvres, prises isolément, présentent un contenu particulièrement riche en préoccupations alimentaires; côte à côte, elles dévoilent une réelle évolution textuelle et thématique, développent et amplifient la question alimentaire qui passe de la quête vitale de subsistance à celle d’une nourriture plus spirituelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".