Concilier défense de la foi protestante et obéissance au pouvoir royal, étude des correspondances de René et Henri de Rohan durant les guerres de Religion (1575-1620)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
René II de Rohan was a minor nobleman during the Wars of Religion. However, he kept up a lively correspondence with Henri de Navarre during the sixth and seventh wars. From conflicts with his neighbors in Laval, to the armed defense of the Protestant faith, to the support of the Catholics of Nantes against the people of Rennes in the acquisition of the parliament of Brittany, these letters give us a clearer picture of this little-known viscount.René was nonetheless a loyal subject of the King of France, in a context where royal power sometimes struggled to make itself heard. Henri II de Rohan, a much more famous member of the said family, remains in his father's worthy lineage, even becoming the great Protestant figure following the death of Henri IV. As such, his correspondence with Louis XIII and Monsieur de Pontchartrain is a good indicator of the difficulties faced by the newly-titled Duc de Rohan. As governor of Poitou for Louis XIII, he managed to defend his co-religionists while trying to maintain good relations with a young king surrounded by fervent Catholics who saw Henri as an enemy to be quickly eliminated.Two conclusions can be drawn from this work. Firstly, faith is a driving force for cohesion, but also for division. However, it is not the only issue at stake: individual interests will also take precedence. Secondly, there is a real balance between defending faith and obeying a faltering royal power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".