MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018338319

Des cancérogènes en milieu de travail? Posez-vous des questions!

2013· article· fr· W7018338319 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerogationContext (archaeology)Term (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le risque de dvelopper un cancer associ au travail est beaucoup moins visible que celui de faire une chute ou de se blesser.Pourtant, selon la CSST, 68 dcs sont survenus au Qubec la suite d'un accident du travail en 2011, contre 100 causs par un cancer li au travail.Ce feuillet concerne tous les milieux de travail, car il n'y a pas que l'amiante qui soit cancrogne!Les cancrognes On peut tre expos des cancrognes sous forme de poussires, de liquide, de gaz, d'ondes, ou autres.Ils sont parfois incolores, sans odeur et invisibles.Le tableau suivant en prsente quelques exemples.Pour consulter une liste des cancrognes, visitez le site Web du Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (CIRC) : http://monographs.iarc.fr/FR/Classification/index.phpPour connatre les cancrognes du Rglement sur la sant et la scurit du travail, voir son Annexe I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207