MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018340364

Defencemen highlight 2015 Hockey Hall of Fame class

2015· other· en· W7018340364 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrophyLeagueGeorge (robot)Class (philosophy)Girl
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A trio of defencemen will take center stage when they are inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame this year. Former Detroit Red Wings Niklas Lidstrom is one of the three. He spent 17 years with the Wings, winning 7 Norris Trophies for best defender and 4 Stanley Cups. Joining him will be a former teammate, forward Sergei Fedorov. In 1,248 career games, Fedorov scored just shy of 500 goals and was the first Russian-born player to win the Hart Trophy- the MVP award- in 1994. Also in class of 2015, defenceman Chris Pronger...who isn't even retired...and was actually just traded over the weekend. He hasn't played because of concussion issues since the 2011-2012 season and isn't expected to play again. Pronger won the Hart Trophy in 2000, won 2 Olympic gold medals, and was named an All-Star four times. Legendary blueliner Phil Housley waited 9 years before getting the call to the Hall of Fame...he's the 4th highest-scoring defenceman in NHL history, and played in nearly 1,500 career games with 8 different teams. Joining the men is one of the most decorated WOMEN'S hockey players in history...American Angela Ruggiero. She won 4 olympic medals, including the gold in 1998. She's just the 4th woman elected to the Hockey Hall of Fame as a player. The 2015 Induction Celebration will be held on Monday, November 9th at the Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6810.362

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)French-language works237,207