MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018341569

Construction of RC staircase for fire exit route at Petronas Research Sdn Bhd, Bangi / Muhammad Badri Maarof

2017· other· en· W7018341569 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Process (computing)Point (geometry)Fire safetyWork (physics)Fire protection
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staircase have been created to ease on access from one to one point in different height. The role of the staircase is on connecting different levels in the shortest and yet convenient way possible.The materials used are depends on client’s request. Most commonly used are wooden and RC staircase. Types of staircase are also differ such as Straight, Spiral, Winder, 2 Quarter Winder, 2 Quarter Landing, Curved, Half Landing and Double Winder. This report is a study on constructing a Straight type RC Staircase for fire escape purpose at Petronas Resarch Sdn. Bhd. (PRSB), Bangi. Some aspect needs to be considered are Personal Protective Equipment of the workers. There are several requirements or laws that need to be followed according to Universal Building By-Law (UBBL). The objective of the study is to obtain the process and step-by-step of constructing a staircase with according to client’s need. Also, not ignoring the safety of the workers, standards and laws related to the construction of staircase. This study will also explain on the elements of the staircase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)French-language works237,207