Des désirs qui orientent : une analyse phénoménologique des identifications et désidentifications lezbiqueer dans l’espace montréalais
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through a critical phenomenological perspective using walking interviews (Ahmed 2006, Lee 2015, Weiss et al., 2019), this thesis explores different meanings associated with the sexual orientations of lesbian, bisexual, queer, fluid and pansexual women in the Montreal context. This approach is based on the experiential sharing of 21 lezbiqueer women with various positionnalities, co-constructing meaning through the trajectories we followed and the photographs submitted by the participants. Sexual identifications questions are linked to spatial questions (Jones and Garde-Hansen 2012, Longhurst and Johnston 2010, Collie 2013, Browne and Ferreira 2015, Podmore 2006 and 2019) through an analysis of both the content of the interviews and the way we walked during these interviews. The three parts of the thesis address migratory trajectories (the experience of arriving in Montreal as a lezbiqueer person), the spaces and identifications of lezbiqueer communities in Montreal from 1980 to today, and the visibilities and sensitivities perceived by lezbiqueer women in public spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".