Cranial pneumaticity of «Ornithomimus edmontonicus» (Ornithomimidae: Theropoda)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern archosaurs have extensive pneumatic invasions derived from nasal and tympanic sinuses.These are present in many fossil archosaurs, but their evolutionary history has yet to be clarified.A full description of the cranial pneumaticity of a well-preserved ornithomimid theropod is presented to help clarify the evolution of this soft tissue using CT scan data and 3D reconstruction.The cranial sinuses of Ornithomimus edmontonicus represent nearly all cranial sinuses of birds and add new information to the range of that of ornithomimids.Phylogenetic comparisons of cranial pneumaticity across theropods with emphasis on O. edmontonicus imply a novel homology between the jugal fossa or recess of non-avian theropods and the suborbital diverticulum of birds.Comparisons also establish the presence of an avian-like nasal sinus morphology at Neotetanurae and tympanic sinus morphology at Coelurosauria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".