MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018360047

Del papel a la pantalla: el caso de Peter Pan

2015· dissertation· es· W7018360047 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)HumanityObject (grammar)Natural (archaeology)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

¿Leer un libro o esperar a la versión cinematográfica? Hablo conscientemente de 'versión' y no de 'adaptación', pues estas últimas no tienen porqué ser fieles a la obra literaria original. La principal motivación de esta investigación, que tiene como objetivo realizar un estudio en relación con el proceso de adaptación cinematográfica de una obra literaria; haciendo hincapié en las alteraciones producidas entre ambos formatos. En primer lugar, se propone una aproximación teórica al concepto 'adaptación' , así como se establecen las variables que serán objeto de análisis; y, en segundo lugar, se estudia el caso de Peter Pan, obra original de J.M. Barrie y las numerosas adaptaciones que derivan de ella.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València)Same topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207