The design of an experimental apparatus for a damped self-pitching wing-in-ground-effect oscillating propulsor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Design of an Experimental Apparatus for a Damped-Self pitching-Wing-in-Ground-Effect Oscillating Propulsor is required to verify the theoretical analysis set forth by Dr. Pengfei Liu in his paper Propulsive Performance of a Twin-Rectangular-Foil Propulsor in a Counter-phase Oscillation (to be published). The prototype will enable us to verify his analysis by changing multiple variables (such as aspect ratios, equilibrium distance between foils, heave amplitude of the foils, angle of attack of the foils, and spring constants) to compare the effects of efficiency and thrust of the propulsor. The prototype will incorporate the motion of the foils to move with a sinusoidal waveform, oscillating in and out with a constant speed and torque. It will also include the capability to allow the foils to pivot on their own axis during their motion, while being damped. The objective of the prototype is to prove that the twin foil anti-acting oscillating propulsors will have an aerodynamic and hydrodynamic advantage for autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), over the single foil configurations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".