MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018398373

DESA1002 'Nine Quarter City' - <Da Rong Chen>

2008· other· en· W7018398373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) · 2008
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreasureQuarter (Canadian coin)Face (sociological concept)HappeningGirlBanquetPeriod (music)ClothingProcessionStyle (visual arts)Stairs
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There was a day, I printed out something about Dubrovnik from our Conon 3 printer. A girl was standing there and waiting for her stuff to print. When my stuff came out, she was surprised. She told me, she was born there, but when she came to Australia, she had never gone back. She said to me: “you don’t know how beautiful the city is if you didn’t be there.” I can still remember how joyful her face expression looks like. At the time, I decided to design something which can gave this city some fresh air. During the time in the second semester, I designed a theatre in Dubrovnik call Friday theatre. Friday is normally the last working day of the week. They can come to enjoy a fantastic show in a theatre after working for a whole week. On the other hand, Dubrovnik is a famous for its long history, fantastic culture and heritage. People from other country like to be there and enjoy the historical atmosphere. Therefore, Dubrovnik is calling for a theatre which can present the treasure of the city to the visitors. The theatre is not only presenting the building itself but also presenting the city. The theatre is at the edge of the city, but it is also the entry of the big city. Stairs around the building are guiding people to go up. When people went up and up, they got to see the whole city step by step. And if they went up to the top theatre, they can see even further. The top theatre is facing west. When there is a show on, the whole city will become its background. And the sunset will be the most beautiful and realistic context they never had for a symphony.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)French-language works237,207