MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018473561

Development and clinical validation of a loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for the rapid detection of Neisseria meningitidis

2011· article· en· W7018473561 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoop-mediated isothermal amplificationNeisseria meningitidisNeisseriaDetection limitPositive predicative valueNeisseriaceaeNucleic acid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is an innovative technique which allows the rapid detection of target nucleic acid sequences under isothermal conditions without the need for complex instrumentation. The development, systematic optimisation and clinical validation of a LAMP assay targeting the ctrA gene for the rapid detect ion of capsular N. meningitidis is described. Highly specific detection of capsular N. meningitidis type strains and clinical isolates was demonstrated, with no cross reactivity with other Neisseria spp., or with a comprehensive panel of other common human pathogens. The lower limit of detection was determined as 6 ctrA gene copies detectable in 48 minutes, with positive reactions readily identifiable visually via a simple colour change. High copy numbers could be detected in 22 minutes. Clinical Validation was carried out by retrospectively and prospectively analysing a total of 935 clinical specimens from a total of 603 patients. The level of agreement between the ctrA LAMP assay and a confirmatory test result (Culture, MRU PCR, ctrA RT-PCR) for each patient was used to evaluate the performance of LAMP for the detection of capsular N. meningitidis. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the designed ctrA LAMP assay was determined as 94.6% and 99.6% with positive and negative predictive values of 96.4% and 99.5% respectively. The potential utility of a positive ctrA LAMP respiratory specimen result to indicate MD was investigated. The sensitivity and specificity of respiratory• specimens in this regard was 89.3% and 97.7% with positive and negative predictive values of 80.7% and 98.9% respectively. Rapid LAMP testing of non-invasive respiratory specimens has significant potential to accelerate the diagnosis of MD. The LAMP method represents a simple, rapid, sensitive, and highly specific technique for the detection of N. meningitidis, and has the potential to be used as a POC molecular test and in resource poor settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Same topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207