Diagnóstico comunitario de salud del Barrio Solamar Alto, septiembre-diciembre de 2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study titled "COMMUNITY DIAGNOSIS OF HEALTH DISTRICT SOLAMAR ALTO, SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2013" is framed in the macro-project entitled NURSING PARTICIPATION MODEL OF COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE - MAIS HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY MOTUPE SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER OF 2013, which seeks to contribute to the social development of the town, bringing with statistical data that will enable them to basic health teams Motupe University Hospital, develop strategies for maintaining and improving the health of individuals, families and communities, from a biopsychosocial, multidisciplinary and intercultural approach. \n \nThis study is descriptive as facts and characteristics related to population and environment is detailed, the instrument for data collection was the family record compiled by the MSP to which I add a container primer necessary information all this being annexed for examination and thus obtain the district's own results. \n \nThe Quarter is distributed Solamar Alto 33 families and 127 inhabitants. The age group 20 to 64 years together with the dominant male in the population. His education is maintained at a basic level. The occupation of the inhabitants is based on agriculture and household chores. In 33 families there consumption of unsafe water, poor sewage and garbage disposal, and hence poverty poor housing conditions, unemployment or informal employment of the household head and overcrowding. Regarding the epidemiological profile Hypertension is the chronic degenerative prevalent in the population followed Diabetes pathology and a person with visual disabilities are also identified and over with physical disabilities. \n \nResearch bibliography and appendices which involves the development of it is supported. \n \nKeywords: Community Health diagnosis Neighborhood “Solamar Alto” and results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".