MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018680881

Egy fel nem fedezett alkotás: Kós Károly Irisz-telepi református temploma

2016· article· en· W7018680881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTransival Digital Database · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject (grammar)Quarter (Canadian coin)History of architectureArchitecturePlan (archaeology)Process (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near the industrial area of Kolozsvár (Cluj-Napoca), within the Iris quarter, on the hill near Deportáltak (Oaşului) street stands the Szent Békesség (Holy Peacefulness) church, also known more commonly as the Iris quarter church. The church was planned by Károly Kós in 1948 and was finally erected between 1950 and 1957.\n This building is worthy of attention because of several reasons and has yet to become the object of any research. Due to this, my study focuses on the reconstruction of its history and building process with as much detail as possible, based on the materials uncovered during my earlier archives research. As a result of the description of the building’s architectural style, I have placed it within the frames of Károly Kós’s vision of architecture.\n The church building clearly shows the features of the vision and experiences that were so characteristic of Károly Kós architectural designs. Aproaching the end of his career, Kós created something in which he expressed the concepts which he had admitted and supported his entire life, this time brought together in a pure crystallized form. Offering to answer a question that has stood since the turn of the century, question focusing on the genesis of contemporary reformed architecture, with this building Kós created the prototype of the contemporary reformed church.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransival Digital DatabaseSame topicHungarian Social, Economic and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207