MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018705586

Dual cultural attitude behaviour of Gen Z consumers to ethical fashion

2023· article· en· W7018705586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)ClothingConsumer behaviourPerspective (graphical)Qualitative researchTasteAction (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background scientific research: Fast fashion and its impact on consumerism has been investigated in extensively in the last decade (Buzzo &amp; Abreu, 2018; Binet et al., 2018; Strähle &amp; Erhardt, 2016). Heatable (2022) and Omondi (2022) recognise that globally the fashion industry is the fourth most polluting. This has resulted in raised social awareness of its environmental impact and unethical practices, which in turn has resulted in demand for sustainable products, ethical consumption and attitude changes (Kudeshia &amp; Kumar, 2017). However, awareness still does not translate into action, causing a gap between consumers’ attitudes toward sustainable fashion, their actual fashion choices (Roozen et al., 2021) and consumption behaviour (Joergens, 2006). Despite consumers' willingness to support environmentalism and make ethical purchasing decisions, they are often under pressure to choose between sustainable products or more affordable and accessible alternatives (Roozen et al., 2021). Both Spanish and Scottish customers are affected by the fast fashion culture. The UK of which Scotland is part, is recognised to have one of the highest apparel and footwear consumer markets. Simultaneously, among all fashion companies in Spain, fifteen of the top retailers are fast fashion brands including Spanish Inditex Group, the leading fast-fashion company in Europe. However, due to the personal values and impact of culture, consumers demonstrate different attitudes towards fashion and values representing their purchasing decisions. Culture has been identified as a factor influencing ethical involvement (Polonsky et al., 2001; Carey &amp; Cervellon, 2014), there are discrepancies as to the dimension of its significance. Polonsky et al. (2001), when investigating eight European countries, including Scotland, did not find relevant differences in perception of ethical consumer behaviour, while Carey &amp; Cervellon (2014) demonstrated a disproportion in attitude towards sustainable fashion between participants from the United Kingdom, France, and Canada. According to Carey &amp; Cervellon's (2014) findings, the higher price of ethical fashion as a result of a higher quality and cost of materials was negatively perceived in the UK, while in France, those features were perceived as redemption for anti-ethical behaviour, like causing atmospheric pollution when using vehicles, skipping recycling or purchasing counterfeit goods. Furthermore, the UK participants tended to assume in advance that ethical fashion is just inherently expensive, and they were unwilling to pay a premium price or further engage in a brand (Carey &amp; Cervellon, 2014). <br/><br/>Research issue to be addressed: This exploratory and comparative research investigates cultural differences of Scottish and Spanish Gen Z consumers to ethical fashion consumption.<br/><br/>Methodology used: An online survey using snowball sampling techniques as a means of dissemination was implemented with Gen Z consumers in Scotland and Spain (defined as born between 1997 and 2006 (above 16 years old) for the purpose of this research). The questionnaire examined buying habits, values sought, ethical relevance when purchasing fashion. A total of 72 (36 Scottish and 36 Spanish) valid responses were obtained. Descriptive analysis and extended statistical analysis of T-tests to observe comparisons on buying habits, economic factors and ethical considerations of purchase behaviour. <br/><br/>Results achieved (conclusions) or expected as well as their relevance for theory and practice: It was found that both Scottish and Spanish respondents differ in terms of buying habits and guiding values. Scottish students tend to purchase fashion more often and spend more. Furthermore, they are driven by distinct purposes and product attributes than Spanish students. Additionally, Spanish participants demonstrated a prominent level of ethical concern in terms of the evaluation of their fashion choices. It was found that Spanish Gen Z consumers consider product sustainability when purchasing fashion, care about the production and fabric details of the garments they use and purchase, or consider sustainable labels. When it comes to Scottish students, despite a positive attitude towards ethical fashion, they demonstrate a lower willingness to engage in sustainable brands than their Spanish contemporaries. However, both groups demonstrate negative attitudes; however, Spanish students tend to be more resolute and sterner when it comes to unethical practices. Hence, this study adds to cultural differences of ethical purchase behaviour experienced by Gen Z consumers.<br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnlineSame topicConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207