Effects of creatine supplementation on muscle metabolism in an Alzheimer mouse model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the most common form of dementia in the elderly, is a global issue affecting about 24 million individuals. Because AD is a systemic pathology, dementia is not the only leading factor contributing to loss of independence in AD patients. AD may also impair skeletal muscle metabolism and function. Creatine (CR) supplementation may enhance skeletal muscle hypertrophy/mass and function in sarcopenia and muscular dystrophies, but has yet to be studied in AD. This study examined the effect of oral CR on muscle metabolism in a triple-transgenic (3xTg) AD mouse model. Twenty-four, 3×Tg AD mice (~8 month-old) were randomly assigned to control (CON) or CR (3% w/w) diet. Bodyweights and feed intakes were measured throughout the 8-week study. Lower limb (quadriceps muscle; QM and gastrocnemius; GM) and upper limb muscles (triceps; TM) were collected to analyze levels of CR, total protein, DNA, RNA, amino acids (AA), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), total and phosphorylated p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K). Data (mean ± SEM) were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test. In comparison to the CON group, CR supplementation increased CR content in both GM (p=0.002) and QM (p=0.037), with higher (p=0.032) ATP/ADP ratio in CR in comparison with CON in QM. A higher protein concentration (p<0.0001) was notable in GM of CR supplemented group vs. CON. Total branched-chain AA levels in QM increased 2-fold (p< 0.0001) in CR groups. Additionally, CR resulted in a higher (p<0.05) protein/DNA ratio; an index of muscle cell size, in both QM and GM for CR groups. The index of cell capacity for protein synthesis (RNA/DNA ratio) in GM was also higher (p=0.001) in CR groups. However, phosphorylation (activation) level of p70S6K, an integral component in protein synthesis signalling pathway, did not show any significant differences in female (p=0.161) and male (p=0.292) CR supplemented groups compared with CON. To conclude, CR supplementation is capable of inducing muscle hypertrophy/growth parameters in the 3×Tg AD mouse model, thereby enhancing protein synthesis capacity in skeletal muscles, thus possibly promoting muscle function in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".