MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018782965

Engelli Çocukların Annelerinin Aktivite Performansının İncelenmesi

2018· dissertation· en· W7018782965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupational stressAnxietySignificant differenceCoping (psychology)Occupational prestigeBeck Depression InventoryDepression (economics)Qualitative researchJob satisfaction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was planned to investigate the occupational performance and occupational satisfaction of mothers of children with disabilities, time use, caregiver burden, stress coping, depression and anxiety. Twenty mothers of children with disabilities and twenty mothers of children with typical development were included. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measurement (COPM) to assess occupational performance with participants, The Modified Occupational Questionnaire was used to determine the time usage history of the activities, the COPE Stress Coping Attitude Questionnaire, the ZARIT Caregiver Burden Scale, BECK Anxiety and BECK Depression Scales were used. All data were analyzed statistically and also qualitative analysis of COPM was performed. There was no statistically significant difference between occupational performances of mothers with handicapped children and mothers of children with typical development(p>0.05) but there was a statistically significant difference in occupational satisfaction (p<0.05). The occupational performance was found to be influenced by time use, a statistically significant difference was found in the sleep and child care occupational areas in the time use of the two groups of mothers (p <0.05). It has been achieved that the most affected occupational performance area of the mothers with handicapped children and mothers with typically development is leisure. There was no statistically significant difference in depression, anxiety and stress coping attitudes between the two groups (p>0.05). It was found that mothers of children with disabilities felt more burden (p <0.05). In the qualitative analysis results of COPM, there are 4 themes as "performing self-care activities", "ensuring home administration", "providing time management" and "achieving productivity and social participation" for typical developing children's mothers. In addition to those four themes for mothers of children with disabilities, 5 themes have been reached with the theme of "supporting my child's development". It has been considered necessary to carry out client-centered occupational therapy assessments and interventions for mothers of children with disabilities to assess the occupational performance and to increase occupational participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it