Erratum: The good food for learning universal curriculum-integrated healthy school lunch intervention: Protocol for a two-year matched control pre-post and case study (JMIR Research Protocols (2021) 10:9 (e30899) DOI: 10.2196/30899)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In "The Good Food for Learning Universal Curriculum-Integrated Healthy School Lunch Intervention: Protocol for a Two-Year Matched Control Pre-Post and Case Study" (JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(9):e30899), one error was noted. In the originally published paper, one author, Sylvana Tu, was not included in the list of authors. Sylvana Tu has now been included in the authorship list between authors Sinikka Elliott and Brent Hills. Sylvana Tu's author affiliation has also been added as follows: Saskatchewan Population Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada This affiliation has been added as affiliation 9 in the corrected paper, and the remaining affiliations have been renumbered accordingly. The full list of authorship and affiliations was as follows in the originally published paper: Rachel Engler-Stringer1, PhD; Jennifer Black2, PhD; Nazeem Muhajarine1, PhD; Wanda Martin3, PhD; Jason Gilliland4, PhD; Janet McVittie5, PhD; Sara Kirk6, PhD; Hannah Wittman2, PhD; Amin Mousavi7, PhD; Sinikka Elliott8, PhD; Brent Hills9, MEd; Gordon Androsoff10, MSc; Debbie Field11, MA; Brit Macdonald12, BA; Chelsea Belt13, MSc; Hassan Vatanparast14, PhD 1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 2Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 4Western University, London, ON, Canada 5Department of Educational Foundations, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 6School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada 7Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 8Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 9Saskatoon Public Schools Division, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 10CHEP Good Food Inc, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 11Coalition for Healthy School Food, Food Secure Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada 12Little Green Thumbs Program, Agriculture in the Classroom, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 13Health Promotion Department, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 14College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada This has been corrected to: Rachel Engler-Stringer1, PhD; Jennifer Black2, PhD; Nazeem Muhajarine1, PhD; Wanda Martin3, PhD; Jason Gilliland4,PhD; Janet McVittie5, PhD; Sara Kirk6, PhD; Hannah Wittman2, PhD; Amin Mousavi7, PhD; Sinikka Elliott8, PhD; Sylvana Tu9, MPH; Brent Hills10, MEd; Gordon Androsoff11, MSc; Debbie Field12, MA; Brit Macdonald13, BA; Chelsea Belt14, MSc; Hassan Vatanparast15, PhD 1Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 2Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 4Western University, London, ON, Canada 5Department of Educational Foundations, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 6School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada 7Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education, College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 8Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 9Saskatchewan Population Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 10Saskatoon Public Schools Division, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 11CHEP Good Food Inc, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 12Coalition for Healthy School Food, Food Secure Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada 13Little Green Thumbs Program, Agriculture in the Classroom, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 14Health Promotion Department, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK, Canada 15College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.174 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.209 | 0.045 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".