Effects of feed-borne Fusarium mycotoxins on fryer rabbits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mycotoxin contamination of feedstuffs is a significant challenge to animal health globally. Deoxynivalenol and zearalenone are the ' Fusarium' mycotoxins most commonly found in Canadian-grown feedstuffs. There is very little information available regarding the sensitivity of fryer rabbits to diets naturally contaminated with 'Fusarium' mycotoxins. The efficacy of a polymeric glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent (GMA) in preventing ' Fusarium' mycotoxicosis was examined. A marked increase in water consumption, and blood urea levels were seen in response to the feeding of contaminated diets. This may have been the result of impaired liver and kidney function. Hypothalamic concentrations of 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and Serotonin (5-HT) were reduced and a correlation between pons 5-HIAA/5-HT and Homovanillic Acid (HVA)/ Dopamine (DA) and feed intake was observed. GMA had little efficacy in preventing the adverse effects of the 'Fusarium' challenge. It was concluded that rabbits are less sensitive to feed-borne 'Fusarium ' mycotoxins than other monogastric species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".