MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018832812

EGOCENTRIC SOCIAL NETWORK FACTORS AND ALCOHOL MISUSE AND RECOVERY

2024· dissertation· en· W7018832812 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Drug AbuseCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsSocial network (sociolinguistics)Association (psychology)Context (archaeology)Alcohol use disorderSocial environmentSocial network analysisMeasure (data warehouse)Psychometrics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An individual’s alcohol use influences, and is influenced by, the drinking in their social network. Indeed, a person’s propensity to drink heavily is associated with having a social network in which more people drink heavily. This association has largely been reported in non-clinical samples of young adults and in networks of 10 or fewer relationships. Exploring social networks in older adults and in more distal relationships may further elucidate the interplay between an individual’s drinking and their social network. This dissertation explores the associations between a person’s social network and their drinking behaviour in adults, in clinical samples of people with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and in both proximal and distal social networks. The first study explores the psychometric properties of a brief egocentric (i.e., individual self-reports on their network) social network analysis (SNA) measure in general community adult drinkers. The second study compares a brief and a more extensive, or formal, SNA measure in terms of the capacity to identify AUD. The third study investigates the association between social networks and recovery from AUD, using a simple measure of social network alcohol use. Finally, the fourth study examines whether a higher-resolution SNA tool could provide a more in-depth understanding of the relationship between social networks and recovery from AUD. The results of this dissertation validate several uses of SNA in the context of AUD in adults: first, a brief measure demonstrates excellent psychometric properties. Second, both brief and formal SNA measures demonstrate the capacity to accurately classify those with and without AUD. Third, social networks play both a moderating and/or mediating role in AUD recovery, depending on the phase of recovery and type of social network measure used. Collectively, this dissertation provides an important foundation for further applications of SNA in clinical research and practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMental Health Research Topics→French-language works237,207→