MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018839094

Equity in Education: Examining the HPCDSB Resource Hub a Mechanism for Teacher Professional Learning about Equity

2024· other· en· W7018839094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Professional developmentResource (disambiguation)Scope (computer science)Social justiceCurriculumHuman resourcesFaculty development
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project examines the development of the Equity, Diversity, Inclusivity, and Anti-Racism (EDIAR) Resource Hub at the Huron-Perth Catholic District School Board (HPCDSB) of Ontario. The Resource Hub is an online platform which is designed to assist educators and school leaders by providing access to a comprehensive depository of resources which includes articles, policy documents, and training modules. Its primary goal is to promote equity in education and facilitate professional development in alignment with Ontario’s Equity and Inclusive Education Strategy (2009) and the Equity Action Plan (2017). The project investigates how the Resource Hub aligns with these strategic frameworks and analyzes its effectiveness in transforming classroom practices, school environments, and leadership approaches within the HPCDSB. By analyzing the development of the Resource Hub, the study explores its contribution to advancing inclusivity and social justice within the educational setting. The project highlights how the Hub supports the development of equitable teaching practices and fosters a culture of inclusivity among staff and students. The project underscores the Resource Hub’s significance in enhancing the accessibility of resources for educators and approaches effective recommendations for refining its functionality and broadening its access. These insights aim to reinforce the Resource Hub’s scope to support educators in their professional growth and drive systemic changes towards greater equity, diversity, and inclusivity in education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.023
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics→French-language works237,207→