Empatija zdravstvenih djelatnika zaposlenih u primarnoj zdravstvenoj zaštiti Krapinsko-zagorske županije
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empatija je ključni element medicinske prakse i imperativ je za uspostavljanje\n međuljudskog odnosa. Predstavlja složenu socio-emocionalnu kompetenciju koja\n obuhvaća različite međusobno povezane komponente. Brojni autori empatiju smatraju\n važnom kompetencijom zdravstvenog djelatnika na kojoj se temelji skrbi za pacijente.\n Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je ispitati koliko je važna empatija u svakodnevnom\n radu zdravstvenih djelatnika u primarnoj zdravstvenoj zaštiti. Istraživanje je provedeno\n korištenjem anketnog upitnika „The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire“ . U istraživanju su\n sudjelovala ukupno 122 sudionika. Prikupljeni rezultati ukazuju na nisku razinu\n empatije. Temljem dobivenih rezultata može se zaključiti kako ispitanici u\n svakodnevnom radu ne koriste empatiju dovoljno. Empatija je važna interpersonalna\n vještina i temeljna komponenta za razvijanje kvalitnog odnosa između zdravstvenog\n profesionalca i bolesnika. Razvijanje empatije ključno je za uspostavljanje odnosa i\n važan je prioritet u obrazovanju studenata zdravstvene skrbi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".