MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018938549

Evaluation of a Re-Engineered Discharge Pharmacy Service at a Pediatric Hospital

2017· dissertation· en· W7018938549 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101HyporeflexiaDiafiltrationDysgeusiaProteogenomicsHyperlactatemia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of my Master of Science in Pharmacy, I have conducted my Personal Research Project within the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO, Ottawa, Canada). CHEO is a pediatric health and research center which opened its doors on May 17, 1974. Today with more than 6,700 admissions, 7,800 surgeries, 169,600 clinic visits each year, it is also one of the busiest pediatric emergency rooms in the country. CHEO provides leading-edge treatment and compassionate care for more than 70,500 children and youth aged 0 to their 18th birthday, from Ottawa, Eastern Ontario, Western Quebec, Nunavut and parts of Northern Ontario each year. In addition, CHEO is an academic health science center providing education to 2,300 future pediatricians and students in nursing and other health professions. In addition, almost 200 researchers at the CHEO Research Institute's conduct $26 million worth of leading-edge pediatric research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)Same topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207