MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018952512

Estrangeirização de terras nos EUA e a cooperação transnacional dos movimentos sociais: a atuação da USFSA

2020· dissertation· en· W7018952512 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLand grabbingGlobalizationPhenomenonCivil societySovereigntyAlienationField researchSocial movement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of land grabbing has attracted international attention due to the contradictions and social reactions that involve the progress of this process. The phenomenon generally affects traditional communities in poor or developing countries, however, it has been identified that it is also affecting traditional communities in developed countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia. Thus, this dissertation seeks to analyze the foreignization of land in the USA, that is, the USA as a target for land investments. Starting from the contradictions that involve the acquisition of land by foreigners, the research has the central objective of understanding why social movements cooperate against the foreignization of land based on the actions of the US Food Sovereignty Alliance. In this way, specific objectives were defined to analyze the land foreignization in the USA, to study the literature on the transnational cooperation of global civil society and to analyze the social reactions to the land foreignization in the USA. To achieve the proposed objectives, in the methodological scope, a qualitative research was developed, using the deductive method of analysis. The analysis techniques used were bibliographic review, document analysis, in addition to field research for conducting semi-structured interviews, which also took place in a virtual manner. After constructing the panorama of land alienation in the USA, identifying the scale of the phenomenon, the main actors, areas of investment and socioeconomic consequences, we sought to present the approaches of transnational rural movements, globalization from below and Transnational Advocacy Networks (TAN) as main approaches to understand the relationship between the Independent Variable (VI) and the Dependent Variable (DV). Based on the analysis of the USFSA's performance, we identified that social movements cooperate against the foreignization of land due to the need to respond globally to international private actors who tend to limit access to land by traditional communities. Cooperation, which takes place transnationally, can be considered as the main action strategy of these movements that seek support, solidarity and sharing information and experiences at the international level, without neglecting the valorization of grassroots communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207