MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018976185

Energy Density of Capelin (Mallotus villosus) and Sand lance (Ammodytes americanus and Ammodytes dubius) during the summer in Coastal Newfoundland

2024· other· en· W7018976185 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsCapelinJuvenileForage fishEnergy densityPredationPopulation density
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spawning capelin (Mallotus villosus) and non-spawning Atlantic sand lance (Ammodytes americanus, A. dubius) adults and juveniles are important forage fish species in coastal Newfoundland during July and August when high abundances of top predators rely on them as critical energy sources. To determine whether these prey types differ in their energy content, and interannual changes in quality, samples of each prey type were collected during July-August 2020 and 2023. Bomb calorimetry was used to measure whole-body dry energy density (kJ/dry g) and calculate wet energy density (kJ/wet g) and water content. Although sand lance are at the peak of their annual lipid cycle and capelin are at their minimum during the summer, adult female sand lance had lower dry energy density (mean of both years ± SE, 20.7 ± 0.11 kJ/dry g) than all capelin sex and maturity categories, and wet energy densities (4.4 ± 0.09 kJ/g) did not differ from capelin. Within capelin, wet and dry energy densities did not differ among gravid females, spent females and males, which contrasts previous findings from before the capelin population in Newfoundland collapsed. Within sand lance, juvenile dry energy density (20.8 ± 0.14 kJ/g) did not differ from adult females. Juvenile sand lance wet energy density was the only prey type that varied interannually, where energy density in 2020 was higher (5.3 ± 0.15 kJ/g), but this is thought to be because the samples were more dried out before collection. Overall, our findings indicate that although sand lance adults and juveniles are similar in wet energy densities to capelin, their lower wet mass per fish would result in a higher number of sand lance needed to reach a fixed energy content per meal. Other factors, including abundance and distribution of each species, also impact foraging costs and must be paired with energy densities to estimate prey type quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.340
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→French-language works237,207→