Estudio comparativo sobre estilos de enseñanza de química general en la Universidad del Valle y su incidencia en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de la licenciatura en educación básica con enfasis en ciencias naturales y educación ambiental [recurso electrónico]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el programa académico de la Licenciatura en Educación Básica con énfasis en Ciencias Naturales y Educación Ambiental, se presenta un alto grado de deserción entre el primer y tercer semestre, por lo tanto se estudió esta tendencia analizando las fichas académicas de los estudiantes para las cohortes de 2003-2006 (se elaboraron tablas y gráficas de tendencias), igualmente se analizaron 2 cursos de química general para esta carrera con el fin de comparar dos estilos de enseñanza (tradicional y técnicas del Aprendizaje Cooperativo) y su incidencia en el rendimiento académico de estos estudiantes tomando como indicador la pérdida o ganancia de esta signatura
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".