Federated Learning With Generalization To New Domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is an area of research that focuses on training machine learning models in a decentralized fashion without having the need to store all data on one central server. In this thesis, we address the challenges of data heterogeneity and label scarcity in FL by proposing two novel approaches for federated domain generalization in both unsupervised and supervised settings. First, to tackle federated domain generalization in an unsupervised setting, we introduce Federated Unsupervised Domain Generalization using Global and Local Alignment of Gradients. We establish a connection between domain shifts and gradient alignment in unsupervised federated learning, demonstrating that aligning gradients at both the client and server levels facilitates the generalization of the model to new, unseen domains. FedGaLA performs gradient alignment locally to encourage clients to learn domain-invariant features, and globally at the server to obtain a more generalized aggregated model. Extensive experiments on four multi-domain datasets—PACS, OfficeHome, DomainNet, and TerraInc—show that FedGaLA outperforms comparable baselines. Ablation and sensitivity studies highlight the impact of different components and hyper-parameters in our approach. Second, to address data heterogeneity in a supervised federated learning framework, we propose Federated Domain Generalization with Label Smoothing and Balanced Decentralized Training (FedSB). FedSB utilizes label smoothing at the client level to prevent overfitting to domain-specific features, thereby enhancing generalization capabilities across diverse domains when aggregating local models into a global model. Additionally, FedSB incorporates a decentralized budgeting mechanism that balances training among clients, improving the performance of the aggregated global model. Experiments on four commonly used multi-domain datasets—PACS, VLCS, OfficeHome, and TerraInc—demonstrate that FedSB outperforms competing methods, achieving state-of-the-art results on three out of four datasets. Collectively, these contributions address critical challenges in FL by enhancing model generalization across diverse and unseen domains in both unsupervised and supervised settings. The effectiveness of FedGaLA and FedSB in addressing data heterogeneity is evidenced by their superior performance in extensive empirical evaluations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".