MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019074148

Experimental evaluation of a DP thruster - near and far wake momentum effects

2005· article· en· W7019074148 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeNozzleMomentum (technical analysis)PropulsionSubmarine pipelineParticle image velocimetryFlow (mathematics)Range (aeronautics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past few years, Dynamic Positioning (DP) systems have seen increasing use in the offshore oil and gas and marine industries. As operations move into more hostile and deeper waters, the need for DP systems has become almost mandatory. Therefore, an understanding of the interaction between the DP thruster wake and structures (production lines, moorings and any submerged structure members) in the slipstream is of great practical interest. There is increasing demand for such information from the offshore oil and gas, and marine industries, to increase the reliability and safety of applying DP systems. In this paper, a detailed momentum analysis of a DP thruster near and far wake using experimental measurements is presented. The wake measurements were performed on a DP thruster model using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV), with and without a nozzle and over a range of advance coefficient values including the bollard pull condition. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and systematic momentum analysis of the flow produced from the operation of a DP thruster with and without a nozzle under varied operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications→French-language works237,207→