MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019076216

Feature Story: Faculty of Fine Arts well represented at Winter Olympics

2010· other· en· W7019076216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueoURspace (University of Regina) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlympiadFine artFeature (linguistics)Diversity (politics)Digital mediaMedia artsCultural diversityThe arts
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While it's the big sporting events at the Vancouver Olympics that are garnering most of the headlines, there is another aspect to the Games that is proving to be immensely popular with visitors from around the world. The Cultural Olympiad is a showcase of Canadian and international arts and popular culture featuring a diversity of music, dance, theatre, visual arts, film, outdoor spectaculars and digital media experiences. Contributing to the cultural smorgasbord are a number of faculty members from the University of Regina's Faculty of Fine Arts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2380.060

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueoURspace (University of Regina)→French-language works237,207→