MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019122056

Examining the role of the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase α2 (AMPKα2) subunit on sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium-ATPase (SERCA) expression and function in sedentary and exercise-trained mice.

2013· dissertation· en· W7019122056 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionTSG101Gestational periodHyporeflexiaSubpoenaDiafiltration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis determined whether changes in adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity would influence sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) content and function in left ventricle (LV) and skeletal muscle isolated from sedentary or exercise trained mice. The data indicate that AMPKα2 kinase dead transgenic (KD) mice, as compared to wild-type (WT) mice, were characterized by reduced SERCA1a, SERCA2a and higher phospholamban (PLN) protein levels in both cardiac and skeletal muscle. Notably, exercise-training up-regulated myocardial SERCA2a protein content by 43%, as compared to sedentary WT mice. In contrast, exercise-training did not alter myocardial SERCA2a protein content in KD mice. Even so, exercise-training up-regulated SERCA1a protein content in skeletal muscle in both WT and KD mice. Based on these data, it appears that an AMPKα2-mediated mechanism influences SERCA2a content and function in the heart and skeletal muscle, which may contribute to the pathophysiology of models characterized by impaired AMPK activity and impaired calcium-cycling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer→French-language works237,207→