MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019132855

Exploring International Graduate Nursing Students' Experiences With, and Response to, the COVID-19 Pandemic and Public Health Measures in Canada: An Interpretive Descriptive Study.

2022· dissertation· en· W7019132855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicThematic analysisPublic healthNurse educationHealth careCoping (psychology)Qualitative researchMeaning (existential)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and public health measures affected international graduate nursing students in diverse ways. The COVID-19 pandemic brought about the closure of educational institutions and the migration to remote teaching and learning. These and related actions limited access to resources such as office spaces and library services for students. In addition, many international students who worked on and off-campus lost their jobs, triggering financial crises. The lockdown and ban on international travel to protect the public from the COVID-19 virus meant that international students could not leave Canada to visit their loved ones abroad. These restrictions had a potential to affect the wellbeing of international students. \nAim: The aim of the study was to explore international graduate nursing students’ experiences with, and response to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated public health measures at a university in a Prairie Province. \nMethod: Interpretive Description (ID) was used to explore the experiences of eight international graduate nursing students in a nursing program located in a Prairie Province, Canada. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with participants after which the data were then transcribed and analyzed using six phases of thematic analysis. \nFindings: The study yielded three major themes: a) COVID-19’s Disruptions; b) Coping with COVID-19 Disruptions; and c) Finding Meaning and Growing amid COVID-19’s Disruptions. Participants reported financial difficulties due to the loss of financial support and jobs. International students who continued working in essential services such as long-term care facilities at the peak of the pandemic were exposed to the COVID-19 infections, however; the jobs provided financial stability for them. International students reported fear and worry about loved ones abroad, as some developed symptoms of mental health disorders as a result. \nConclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic affected international graduate nursing students’ wellbeing in various ways. Despite the impact on their wellbeing, they were resilient and continued their studies. They employed coping mechanisms such as talking to family members and friends via social media channels. Some also sought help from mental health specialists to mitigate difficult challenges of the COVID-19. Loss of community on campus may have been the most profound loss to the international graduate nursing students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207