MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019167227

Exilio e identidad en los escritores españoles en Francia: Jacques Folch-Ribas

2016· other· es· W7019167227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) · 2016
Typeother
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)Context (archaeology)Meaning (existential)Masking (illustration)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A raíz de la Guerra civil española, numerosos escritores e intelectuales se vieron obligados a exiliarse en Francia. El exilio conlleva la adaptación forzosa a un nuevo contexto con los consiguientes conflictos de tipo identitario, que se manifiestan en una compleja dualidad tanto cultural como lingüística. La obra de Jacques Folch-Ribas, arquitecto, urbanista y novelista nacido en Barcelona en 1928, exiliado en Francia en 1939, y finalmente instalado en Quebec desde 1956, muestra el recorrido identitario de un escritor que nunca volvió a residir en España y que se (re)construyó una nueva identidad híbrida, múltiple y única al mismo tiempo, sin lograr, sin embargo, liberarse jamás del peso originario de la aflicción del exilio. De la herida originaria provocada por el exilio a la memoria nostálgica del paraíso perdido de la infancia, pasando por la celebración de la identidad del país de acogida, la obra de Folch-Ribas es el reflejo de su propio recorrido identitario. La escritura se constituye en lugar de memoria, de cuestionamiento, de anamnesis y de reconstrucción identitaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)Same topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207