MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019260699

Fact book on aging in British Columbia, 3rd Edition

2000· book· en· W7019260699 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2000
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnic groupPovertyPopulationDistribution (mathematics)Population ageingMarital statusIncidence (geometry)Household income
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Table of ContentsForeword; 1. Size of the Elderly Population; 1.1 Past Trends and Future Growth; 1.2 Population Aging Within the Older Population Itself; 1.3 Median Age of the Population; 2. Sex Ratio; 3. Mortality; 3.1 Trends in Life Expectancy; 3.2 Deaths and Mortality Rates; 3.3 Causes of Death; 3.4 Cancer; 4. Marital Status; 5. Geographic Distribution and Mobility; 5.1 The Older Population of B.C. in Relation to Other Provinces; 5.2 Rural-Urban Distribution; 5.3 Geographic Distribution Within British Columbia; 5.3.1 Geographic Distribution Within the Greater Vancouver Regional District; 5.3.2 Geographic Distribution Within the Capital Regional District; 5.4 Mobility; 5.4.1 Total Population and Population Aged 65+;5.4.2 Distance Moved; 6. Ethnic Composition; 6.1 Predominant Groups; 6.2 Proportion of Ethnic Origin Groups Aged 65+; 6.3 Visible Minorities; 6.4 Mother Tongue; 6.5 Immigrants; 6.6 Aboriginal Peoples; 7. Living Arrangements; 7.1 Persons by Type; 7.2 Types of Household; 8. Housing; 8.1 Home Ownership 8.2 Housing Costs; 8.3 Preferred Structural Type; 9. Education 9.1 Educational Attainment; 9.2 Educational Attendance; 10. Labour Force; 10.1 Labour Force Participation Trends; 10.2 Full and Part-time Employment; 11. Unpaid Activities; 11.1 Unpaid Housework; 11.2 Unpaid Caregiving to Seniors; 11.3 Unpaid Childcare; 12. Income; 12.1 Median Income of Individuals; 12.2 Poverty Rate; 12.3 Incidence of Low Income Among Economic Families; 13. Disabilities; 13.1 Disability Rates;13.2 Seniors with Disabilities in Private Households and Institutions; 13.3 Nature of Disabilities; 13.4 Severity of Disabilities; 14. Health Service Utilization; 14.1 Hospitals; 14.2 Continuing Care; 14.3 Health Service Expenditures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207