Foi et images : enjeux spirituels et pédagogiques du tableau religieux dans les paroisses rurales au Bas-Canada. Deux études de cas à partir du fonds de tableaux Desjardins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notre mémoire s’intéresse au fonds de tableaux Desjardins, plus spécifiquement aux œuvres acquises par les paroisses rurales du Bas-Canada entre 1817 et 1833, dans l’optique d’une utilisation à des fins surpassant la seule ornementation. D’abord, il s’attarde à la situation de l’Église catholique au sein de la colonie au tournant du XIXe siècle, moment de l’arrivée des tableaux. Ensuite, il démontre l’intérêt des ecclésiastiques du Bas-Canada à l’égard des images et leur conscience des services qu’elles peuvent rendre à la religion. Ultimement, par le biais des ensembles constitués par les paroisses de Saint-Henri de Lévis et Saint-Antoine de la Baie-du-Febvre, notre étude définit les moyens habilitant les toiles du fonds de tableaux Desjardins à supporter les pratiques dévotionnelles et à participer à l’instruction catéchistique des fidèles de la colonie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".