Fine screen faunal analysis from the Hartley Site (FaNp-19)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It's not your blue blood, your pedigree or your college degree.It's what you do with your life that counts."-Millard Fuller (1935--J, co-founder of Habitat for Humanity.The Hartley site• (FaNp-19) is a Late Prehistoric multicomponent habitation site located just south of the city of Saskatoon proper, but within the city-limits.The site is located in a series of stabilized sand dunes with slightly rolling terrain.The Hartley site is part of the original larger Preston Avenue site first recognized by KenCronk.There were a number of questions that were to be answered in this study, in regard to the fine screen assemblage. 1) How would using just the available material affect the analysis?, 2) How would the different methodologies affect the results?Taking those variables into account, what information could be acquired regarding subsistence strategy, seasonality and the paleoecology at the site?There were two amphibians, one reptile, six varieties of gastropods and a number of small and micro-mammals that were identified.It is interesting to note: that there was also a mini projectile point recovered in the fine screen material made of Swan River chert.Previous conclusions from Grant Clarke's (1995) thesis regarding what species were consumed were confirmed.The recovery of specimens from animals that hibernate in the winter have provided additional information regarding the page 11 seasonality at the site, suggesting that the season of occupation may extend into the spring.The gastropods, small mammals, reptile and amphibians provided a good framework on which to base the sympatry analysis.These species, many from similar environments and others that are more adaptable, afforded a comprehensive look at the past environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".