MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019327837

Final Recommendations on Graduate Education from the Academic Issues and Student Administrative Processes Work Groups

2015· report· en· W7019327837 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · 2015
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Graduate EducationMcMaster UniversityMcKnight Foundation
KeywordsWork (physics)Corporate governanceGraduate educationGraduate studentsHigher educationAction (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

University of Minnesota. Academic Issues Work Group; University of Minnesota. Student Administrative Processes Work Group. (2010). Final Recommendations on Graduate Education from the Academic Issues and Student Administrative Processes Work Groups. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/170123.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.073
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.105
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0730.105
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0210.011
Open science0.0090.015
Research integrity0.0370.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)French-language works237,207