Exportación del hilado de algodón en la empresa La Colonial Fábrica de Hilos S.A. tras la firma del tratado de libre comercio (TLC) Perú-Canada 2014 - 2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como objetivo determinar la relación la producción y \nexportación del hilo de algodón de la empresa la colonial fábrica de hilos S.A 20014 - \n2017. El método utilizado para la investigación es no experimental debido a que los \ndatos son ex post facto, es decir, no hubo manipulación de datos ya que se encuentran \nexistentes en fuentes confiables, los cuales fueron organizados en dos listas sobre \nexportación y capacidad de producción. Para el análisis se eligieron los productos del \nhilado de algodón, obteniéndose con respecto a ello datos sobre el valor y volumen de \nventas exportables a los confeccionistas. Los datos presentados fueron realizados \nmediante el uso de tablas y gráficos de líneas, donde indicó la tendencia en el período \ntomando como referencia los siguientes indicadores venta anual y volumen de \nproducción.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".