MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019451171

Guide d'accueil à l'intention des personnes immigrantes Bienvenue...au Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean

2005· other· fr· W7019451171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSDEIR (University of Quebec at Chicoutimi) · 2005
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationGensCultural environmentKingdom
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il me fait plaisir de joindre ma voix à celles des gens de ma région pour vous souhaiter la plus cordiale des bienvenues au Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean. Vous découvrirez ici, à coup sûr, une population chaleureuse et accueillante. Les mots cordialité, entraide et solidarité se conjuguent en harmonie et prennent tout leur sens. Afin de vous accompagner dans la découverte de cette belle région, votre chez-vous, d'apprécier son hospitalité proverbiale et sa culture originale, de vous familiariser avec sa nature exceptionnelle, nous avons rédigé à votre intention ce Guide d'accueil. Vous y trouverez une mine d'informations et de conseils qui faciliteront vos premiers pas. Il vous fournira des renseignements sur l'éventail de services et de programmes gouvernementaux disponibles et comment y avoir accès. Vous pourrez vous y familiariser avec les lois canadiennes et québécoises vous protégeant, vous et votre famille. Vous y dénicherez des indications sur l'accès aux services de santé, d'éducation et de soutien à l'emploi ou, tout simplement, comment entrer en relation avec les nombreux services d'aides-conseils. Ce guide simplifié saura répondre à vos attentes...et bien davantage. Signé par Bernard Généreux, président de la Conférence régionale des élus (CRÉ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSDEIR (University of Quebec at Chicoutimi)French-language works237,207