Fragilidade e apoio social e familiar de idosos em contextos de vulnerabilidade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to analyze the relationship between of frailty and the family social relationships of the elderly \nin a context of social vulnerability. Methods: a cross-sectional study with elderly people enrolled in five \nReference Centers for Social Assistance. Sample for convenience composed of 247 elderly. For data collection, \na sociodemographic questionnaire, Edmonton Frailty Scale, Genogram and Eco-maps were used. Social \nvulnerability characterized according to Social Vulnerability Index. Results: of the respondents, 41.7% did not \npresent frailty, 21.5% were apparently vulnerable and 36.8% frail. There was no significant difference between \nfrailty and family relationship. There was significant difference between frailty and external attachment \n(p=0.010), indicating that elderly individuals with frailty at some level had a limited external link. Conclusion: \nelderly people who have a close relationship with family members, did not present frailty, while the majority of \nthe elderly who do not have external ties, presented some level of frailty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".