Insertion de la réserve huronne dans l’espace urbain de la ville de Québec : influences de la proximité de Québec sur Wendake / The incorporation of the Huron Reserve in the urban space of Quebec City: influences due to Wendake’s proximity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Original abstract in French] Cet article analyse certains aspects liés à la situation urbaine de Wendake dans la périphérie de la ville de Québec, aspects qui sont à la base des particularités du développement socio-économique de la communauté huronne. La proximité de la capitale provinciale joue un important rôle positif dans le développement économique de Wendake et lui assure une position de centre politique pour les nations autochtones du Québec. L’urbanisation de la région de Québec a progressivement entraîné Wendake dans ce processus un métissage tangible. La morphologie du cadre bâti de la réserve a aussi subi une évolution particulière, reflétant aujourd’hui l’amalgame des cultures amérindienne et européenne. Réserve située au carrefour des cultures, de la modernité et de la tradition, Wendake est aujourd’hui le lieu de vie d’une communauté jeune et dynamique. \n \nAbstract in English: This article analyzes certain aspects of the urban situation of Wendake as it relates to the socio-economic development of this Huron community, located in the periphery of Quebec City. The proximity of the provincial capital plays a positive role in the economic development of Wendake and ensures it a central political position vis-à-vis the Indigenous Nations of Quebec. The urbanization of the area surrounding Quebec City gradually enveloped Wendake in this process of mixing cultures. The character of the Reserve’s development also reflects a particular evolution and an amalgam of the Amerindian and European cultures. As a reserve at the cross-roads of cultures and of modernity and tradition, Wendake today is a young and dynamic community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".