MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019650921

FOLHA da Embrapa: salto tecnológico na produção de peixes.

2016· other· pt· W7019650921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueinfoteca-e (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) · 2016
Typeother
Languagept
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova (rocket)Context (archaeology)Nova scotia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kit de ordenha mecânica: eficiência no campo; Via nova com o programa saber viver; A história de duas Heloísas que vivem na África; Por dentro da operação Arco-Verde no Nordeste; Projeto Aguabrasil: mais peixe e de excelente qualidade; Nova unidade em Tocantins; A palavra é de Daniel Papa; Para mapear o clima da Empresa; Os projetos dos colegas que saem no PDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.337

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueinfoteca-e (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation)French-language works237,207