IMPLANTAÇÃO DE UM MARCO GEODÉSICO E PONTO DE APOIO PLANIALTIMÉTRICO NO CAMPUS DO CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE MARINGÁ - UNICESUMAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cidade de Maringá atualmente conta com apenas dois marcos geodésicos, localizados na Universidade Estadual de Maringá. O Centro Universitário de Maringá - UniCesumar possui uma grande infraestrutura em uma região da cidade em pleno desenvolvimento, sem nenhum ponto de referência geodésico. Este trabalho tem por objetivo implantar um marco geodésico, seguindo-se todos os manuais de padronização do IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística), e um ponto de apoio planialtimétrico no campus do Centro Universitário de Maringá, e dessa forma além de contribuir com as atividades de ensino, contribuir com os profissionais da área que necessitam realizar trabalhos de Engenharia nesta região da cidade. Realizou-se o rastreio de coordenadas dos pontos com o aparelho GPS (Global Positioning System), e o pós-processamento de dados com o programa Leica Geo Office Combined. Os resultados encontrados para o marco geodésico atenderam todos os manuais de padronização do IBGE e os do ponto de apoio planialtimétrico atenderam as normas para levantamentos geodésicos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".