Implementación del Ciclo Deming aplicada a la ejecución proyectos de agua potable y alcantarillado desde el enfoque de la valorización de obra, Lima- 2024
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Datos Generales Consorcio San Miguel constructora que cuenta en sociedad formada por 2H Ingeniería y Construcción S.A.C., China Machinery Engineering Corporation y Sigma S.A. 1.2. Nombre o Razón Social CONSORCIO SAN MIGUEL RUC N°20607900052 1.3. Ubicación de la Empresa Dirección legal: Av. Pachacutec N°2580 A.H. Villa Jardin Zn. Dos (Paradero Tren Villamaría del Triunfo) – Lima Lima Villa María del Triunfo, teléfono: 923 – 532 – 156 1.4. Giro de la Empresa Dedicada a la ejecución de obra de saneamiento que interviene obras civiles, equipamientos hidráulicos, líneas, redes y conexiones de agua potable y alcantarillado y muro de contención en los distritos de villa maría, villa salvador y san juan de Miraflores. 1.5. Tamaño de la Empresa El consorcio es una gran empresa por la magnitud de la obra en ejecución es alrededor de 1´200´000´000.00 soles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".