MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7019806312

Ipsi sugunt sanguinem et medullam miserae plebis Franco-gallicae”: gli italiani in Francia nella lunga età moderna (XIV-XX secolo)

2012· article· en· W7019806312 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUnitusOpen (Tuscia University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRégion NormandieQueen's UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsState (computer science)Social groupSocial lifePeriod (music)Social policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the base of the state and social policies towards immigrants,there are always the reactions of local people: these, however, can be concrete or only feared. Also, if concrete, may be the result of a spontaneous\nmotion, or can be caused by a particular social group or by those in power. On this question we have a very rich and very interesting literature. However, the analyses are generally targeted at the present or, at most, at the immediate past. Instead the problem is much older so that the evolution of the modern State is often linked to immigration. A particularly interesting case is that of acceptance of Italians in France, because their migration dates to medieval times and it is therefore contemporary to the development of the French state and the French national consciousness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.867
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it