Il medico in formazione specialistica tra competenza e accoglienza. Il progetto ‘Form-ART-zione’ per il benessere della persona e l’umanizzazione della medicina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay aims to reflect on well-being in the university environment for a skills-based approach as a training model of value for each and every one. In an exploratory form, a pedagogical reflection takes shape on the need to integrate medical training and the humanization of care. The reflection in question focuses on the Form-ARTzione project, for the training and teaching reorganization of the School of Specialization in Radiotherapy. The project, starting from the year 2020, following the indications of the ESTRO documents (The European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology) and accepting the inspiration, in a broad pedagogical sense, of the CanMEDS proposals (published by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada), took the form of the analysis of training settings, introducing innovative and active teaching/learning methods, to motivate students to research and internalize knowledge and skills more focused on the protagonism of the specialists, sharing and collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".