Individual Transferable Quotas in Clams and Fish: A Comparative Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Individual transferable quotas (ITQs) are widely advocated as ways to rationalize over-capitalized and over-exploited fisheries. They are best known through experiences in New Zealand, Australia, and \nIceland beginning in the 1980s. Because of case studies being done in the 1990s, a comparative analysis of newer ITQ-based management regimes in the U.S. and Canada is now possible. Research on ITQs in the U.S. federal surf clam and ocean quahog fishery and the Canadian groundfish \nfishery for mobile gear under 65' in length in the Scotia-Fundy region suggests a series of lessons about the introduction, acceptance, and consequences of ITQs for fisheries management. Research is also \nunderway on the Western Newfoundland mobile gear ITQ fishery and on the Eastern Newfoundland crab fishery, among the many that have not been converted to ITQs. This paper reports solely on the comparison between the US clam fishery and the Scotia-Fundy groundfish fishery."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it