MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7019825402

Identifying Clinical Factors Associated with Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women with Inherited Bleeding Disorders: A Population-based Cohort Study of Women in Ontario

2022· dissertation· en· W7019825402 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)PopulationRisk factorDiseaseCohort studyPregnancy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency. Inherited bleeding disorders (IBD) can increase PPH risk, however the impact of other risk factors (including anemia, parity) on this association remains unclear. Women with IBD may be anemic due to increased bleeding tendencies; however, the pathways linking IBD, anemia and PPH have not been fully characterized. This thesis aimed to identify maternal, clinical, and delivery characteristics associated with PPH among women with, and without, IBDs. Objectives: 1) To determine and compare PPH incidence among women with and without IBDs; 2) to determine the effect of IBD on PPH; 3) to determine if anemia at admission for delivery mediates the relationship between an IBD and PPH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data housed within ICES (formerly: the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences). Women with an in-hospital, live or stillborn delivery between 2014-2019 were included. To address Objective 1, PPH incidence proportions were calculated. Objective 2 was addressed using block-analysis regression. Objective 3 was addressed using mediation analysis. Analysis was restricted to the first delivery in the accrual period and stratified by parity. Results: 601,773 women were included; 2,002 (0.33%) had an IBD. PPH incidence was 1.5x higher (7.30 vs. 4.93 cases/100 deliveries, std. difference 0.1) among women with an IBD compared to unaffected women. Women with IBDs were slightly older, and more frequently diagnosed with chronic hypertension, anemia, and prior PPH. Among the total cohort, an IBD was associated with increased risk of PPH (adjusted RR [aRR] = 1.26; 95% CI 1.08, 1.46). Among multiparous women, prior PPH was associated with increased PPH risk, while IBD had no effect (aRR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.86, 1.40). Anemia, placental conditions, multifetal gestation, and induction were associated with increased PPH risk among all cohorts. Despite significant associations between each of IBD, PPH and anemia at admission for delivery, the latter did not mediate the IBD-PPH relationship. Conclusions: Optimal maternal outcomes require identification of maternal risks. Study findings can be used to inform guideline development and healthcare provider education and will contribute to improved health and quality of life of women with bleeding disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMaternal and fetal healthcare→French-language works237,207→