The influence of geotechnical settings on Canadian pipeline failure rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Исследовательская работа посвящена геолого-геоморфологическим характеристикам, как главным компонентам инженерно-геологических условий. Цель работы – выявить влияние инженерно-геологических условий на аварийность трубопроводов Канады. Среди анализируемых геолого-геоморфологических характеристик: абсолютная высота, относительная высота, горизонтальная кривизна, вертикальная кривизна, уклон, экспозиция, близость к структурной линии, приуроченность к элементарной земной поверхности, генетический тип четвертичных отложений. Среди всех аварий за период с 2008 по 2019 год, зарегистрированных в Канаде, для анализа выбраны 265 инцидентов, вызванных двумя группами факторов: природным и коррозией. Данные о геолого-геоморфологических характеристиках получены по топографическим картам и картам четвертичных отложений Канады при помощи программного обеспечения QGIS. В результате исследования выявлены максимальные значения удельной аварийности для каждого анализируемого параметра.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".