The "I"s of Quebec Cinema: The Paradigm of Autoethnography in the Building of National Cinema (1938-1968)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis combines the concept of autoethnography with recent research that has linked orality and the development of Quebec cinema. It focuses on the historical desire for self-representation that preoccupied Quebec filmmakers before the institutionalization of Quebec cinema as a culture industry in the 1970s, and underlines a corresponding genealogy of films centered on the filmmaker’s presence and first-person discourse. In a handful of foundational films starting with those of Albert Tessier, and moving to the work of Claude Jutra, Gilles Groulx and Anne-Claire Poirier, the thesis argues that the filmmaker’s subjectivity embodies the Quebecois community which is made “other” within the space of Canadian and global cinema. The mediation of autobiographical traces conceives film as a “living experience” of culture and identity, embodied in the filmmaker’s own body and/or voice. I argue that autoethnographic expression is closely tied to the building of Quebec’s national cinema, as a discursive practice emphasizing agency, perspective, and the right to self-representation. Yet, the genealogical approach of the thesis also observes how this mediation of individual identity complicates collective identity in the process. The nation is rendered a site of competing experiences and perspectives, in dialogue or in conflict with each other across time. Overall, the thesis invites the reader to consider first-person cinema as a paradigmatic form of political inscription in Quebec, and to question notions of “authenticity” and homogeneity in the study of Quebec cinema. Identity entails a process of negotiation that is open-ended and can always be reframed and appropriated by the “other” within.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".